hithere, SNAP, readthis, Max&Ruby, RubysMom, MissMyMan, Teacup, Milkmaid, MarshM, (and there are a few others thrown in) You need to come back under your real name.

It’s A Snap, and Teressa Link.

We know who you are on DS, CDN, and MCN. All the IPs link back together.

Stop making new names, own up to your past, and just stay away from the forums. OK?

And of course, it is Tuesday…

  1. DeviateFromTheNorm says:


  2. MonsterBabyMaker says:

    I just have to say, are her kids really named Max and Ruby? Like that really annoying rabbit cartoon? If so, that’s just mean.

  3. Kristen says:

    LOL You took my comment. And to think…we were 2.5 hrs from Tuesday being over.

  4. adensmama says:

    I kinda like the cartoon Max & Ruby 😀 Well, really I only like Max, his older bunny sister is super annoying.

    My DD loves it!

  5. Kristen says:

    Ugh, I have to plan my errands around freaking Max & Ruby. If we have to leave and the tv is on M&R, my dd freaks out. How many 3yo’s do you know who will hand you the remote and say “Mama, DVR?”

  6. Just Peachy says:

    We don’t have dvr anymore but mine would always ask me to record Caillou for her. Now its on demand mama?

  7. redfish bluefish says:

    Ah, so bright there Teresa.


    ‘I feel you creepin’, I can see you from my shadow….’

  8. redfish bluefish says:

    zomg Caillou makes my ears bleed. I cannot stand him! Max & Ruby are okay but now everytime they come on, Teresa is gonna come to mind.

  9. redfish bluefish says:

    Okay, so I went to Felitwat’s blog to try and hunt down where Teresa/Teacup told her to off herself and got distracted by her recent entry.


  10. cheesewhiz says:

    Geez, of course its Tuesday…but I guess its always Tuesday at Snatch’s house.

  11. insomniac says:

    The dedication it takes to be so insane is quite impressive if you think about it long enough.

  12. just_another_heather says:

    Caillou is satan spawn. The whining makes my ears bleed. M & R are ok but R is a bossy little bunny

  13. Just Peachy says:

    I hate Caillou but he’s the one thing that can make her happy and keep her occupied while I shower lately so I deal with it.

  14. monkey says:

    And in Spanish, “Aw chusquito!”

  15. Kelolsen says:

    see I need you guys to find the trolls for me. I honestly have NO idea who Max and Ruby even are! I would never have caught that.

  16. Taterbug says:

    She managed to keep her crazy under pretty good control this time around.

  17. smurfmeat says:

    Was Teacup the person posting all that crazy stuff on DS about She-Who-Must-Not-Be-Named?

  18. Myself says:

    16 – yes

  19. MotherMoonPads says:

    Max and Ruby is the most annoying show ever. I contemplated blocking it :err:

  20. eeek says:

    OMFG. What giant gaping hole in her life compels her to desperately try to return again & again? It’s like F-word said on the other thread, and I totally paraphrase, “I have a secret really well liked persona on CDN, you’ll never know who it is either”.

    What makes their lives so frickin pitiful that she (they) keep trying to prove that we WILL like them, if they just try AGAIN. And of course they lie about every little detail because their attempt to be themselves failed so badly. What does it prove, if you manage to trick people into liking you by being the polar opposite of your real self?

    Wouldn’t you just MOVE ON? Go, maybe try to figure out WTF is up with your own head, there IS a reason when someone gets banned all over the place for twatwafflery. Then when you think you’ve got your shit more together and can acknowledge everyone was NOT picking on you, try to find some other internet home.

    I think it’s hilarious that IAS was the vile bitch to F., it fits so many profiles in crazy.

  21. Incognizable says:

    redfish..did you notice that “hithere” posted on that blog and that accoring to IP’s “hithere” is also “Teacup” and Teresa?? Oh the irony, LOL

  22. DSDM2 says:

    Incog, that only applies on sites that I can check or have confirmed. Obviously, not on hers. HiThere isn’t very original, so my guess is it might not be the same person as “hithere” on our blog.

  23. sciencefair says:

    Suddenly I feel a great desire to lock all the trolls in a room and let them fight to the death. It can be scheduled for next Tuesday. I will bring the pop corn.

  24. smartassmama says:

    Read this also defended her a couple days ago.

  25. volbaby07 says:

    wasn’t F married before she was 18 and when those pics were taken? if so, then she was no longer a minor child. ridiculous.
    and as for snatch, she needs to get a life. i don’t understand this desperate need to keep coming back and trying to prove something.

  26. felishasjourney says:

    25, So people that get married at 12 in other countries aren’t minors?

    I’m pretty sure they are. You’re fucking stupid. YOU need to get a life.

  27. Incognizable says:

    you are right DSDM, my assuption was based on the fact that wordpress autofills my name/ email on both blogs.

  28. redfish bluefish says:

    LOL I did, 21. I commented on She Who Must Not Be Named’s blog just now (as myself. Not hidin’) and gave her a heads up. I could be wrong. I prob. shouldn’t have shared that with her but it’s too late to go back now.

  29. Just Peachy says:

    Well if the blog gets in trouble then f word should too. Even if you are a minor you can get in trouble for distributing pornography even if it is of yourself. Note the case where the 15 year old sent nude pics of herself all over the web. I think all she got was probation tho.

  30. DeviateFromTheNorm says:

    28- Yes, if she pressed charges for photos being posted here (which is doubtful, but we all know she’s crazy), the DA where ever it was done would also be obligated to press charges against HER for distributing said kiddie porn in the first place. No charges could stand against anyone who posted a link, because she supplied it in the first place. Aaah, the joys of having a DH in criminalistics and computer forensics. 😛

  31. smartassmama says:

    She still owns said “CP” herself. Admittedly.

  32. felishasjourney says:

    Um for you fucking cunts. My ex took the pics on his cellphone. That I still have because i bought it.

    HE posted them online. HE sent them to people. Not me. jesus fuck

  33. thewitch says:

    Is she still selling or just prowling the forums?

  34. Myself says:

    In most states when you get married as a minor, you are emancipated, and therefore the legal age of consent, as well as legal age of contractual agreements which includes whether or not you want to pose nude. It does vary though.

  35. Myself says:

    In most states “The term “emancipation” refers generally to the legal process by which a minor child is released from some or all of the legal disabilities of childhood, and receives the rights and duties of adulthood before the age of 18.

  36. Myself says:

    (g) Except for specific constitutional and statutory age requirements for voting and use of alcoholic beverages, a minor whose disabilities are removed for general purposes has the power and capacity of an adult, including but not limited to the right to self-control, the right to be domiciled where one desires, the right to receive and control one’s earnings, to sue or to be sued, and the capacity to contract.

    ALL my posts are regarding She-Who-Must-Not-Be-Named – well the last three at least

  37. MotherMoonPads says:

    I was married at 17, and was not considered emancipated (this was 10 years ago). I had to have my husband’s permission to see the doctor and the dentist.

  38. Myself says:

    35 – If you are emancipated you can sign everything yourself. You just need to bring your emancipation paperwork with you.

  39. MotherMoonPads says:

    That’s what I’m saying though. I was NOT emancipated, simply because I was married 🙂 My “guardian” simply transferred from being my mother to my husband (legally).

  40. Myself says:

    37 – AHHH, my post does say that it varies per state.

  41. smartassmama says:


    Check out #6! I lol’d. That lady has balls. Honest balls.

  42. redfish bluefish says:

    39-copy/paste please? I don’t go to DS anymore.

  43. Myself says:

    By “FindingStrength”

    :Last spring/summer when she broke her leg, and arm…..my dad said he couldn’t find any of her spring/summer clothes. So I spent ALOT of money buying her easy to wear tanks, shorts, t shirts, blouses, capris and even nighties and undies, bras that hook in the front so she wouldn’t have to reach behind her. Because she had physical and occupational therapy where they watched her get dressed to prove she could partially care for herself. ( I was still working 40 hours a week then, and she needed 24 hr care unless she could prove she could sponge bath herself, toilet herself and dress herself)
    Anyway, I guess she must have taken those clothes to her storage unit because its hot here and she doesn’t have them. Which means either the clothes are lost in there or got ruined in there.
    Because she’s stealing mine. I saw her in my grey shorts, and so gave her a pair of my capris that don’t fit, I saw her in clothes that my cousins girlfriend left here (which is a stretch GF was a 7/9 and mom is a 14/16) Today she was wearing one of my tank dresses as a tank top. I’ve only worn it twice. I know last year I packed it in a storage tub in the basement. So not only does she go thru the clothes I’m currently wearing, but the stored ones too. I looked in her room and her drawers are packed full of my clothes, my socks. I really don’t mind the stuff I can’t wear, but the stuff I do wear, and my stored clothes. That makes me mad.

    Dh tells me I should say something but I don’t know. If I do she’ll just have a fit. And I really don’t want to deal with it. I just want to go buy her other clothes and socks but Dh says no way.

    So I did some detailed looking in her room and I did find a few of the things I bought her last year. But not the really nice stuff I bought her. I have no idea what happened to it. I know at one point in time she was complaining the shorts/capris were too big. I had to buy a 18/20 to get it over her leg brace she had to wear 24/7. But I bought drawstring waist. I wonder if she gave them away. Or threw them away.:

    By Post #6 “betty_joanne”

    :Wow, you have a lot of people to take care of.
    Maybe it would be best to not live in the same house as your mom.:

  44. angelique says:

    23. ha ha! Apparently there would only be one person in that “troll room”. I am so tired of her wasting blog space.

  45. angelique says:

    oh and about “Finding Strength”. Her threads are always full of drama and so outrageous with her home life. Maybe she is legit but I don’t even bother reading her posts. It is very over the top and trollish to me.

  46. MotherMoonPads says:

    #38, can we blame my totally glossing over the most part on the sleeplessness that comes with a newborn? 🙂

  47. Redhead says:

    39- I lol’d too, then H2BAM came in and reprimanded her…

    43- I don’t see why she needed to post that thread in the first place.. seriously how hard is is to go tell your mom to stay out of your clothes?

  48. redfish bluefish says:

    Aw I feel sorry for her Mom. Shes not only bitching about her but shes also listing what clothes size she wears and thats a bit personal imo. I hope her Mom never comes across that…I’m sure she’d be hurt. Shes going thru enough right now with having a broke arm/leg.

    This is of course, ASSuming shes telling the truth.

    Thanks for copying/pasting 😀

  49. Kelolsen says:

    I’d love to see how Felicia comes up with the money to sue a diaper board and what lawyer will take it on when he hears the full story.

  50. DSDM2 says:

    Kelolsen, she would have a hard time. She has to prove a lot. Her main case would be to try to sue for libel. But she can’t really. She has to prove falsity. We don’t have to prove truth. Not to mention we only need reasonable belief for protected opinions.

    There is a settled area of law which prohibits people from collecting compensation if they are harmed by activities they agree to.

    So in her case, with libel, this means that people cannot successfully sue for libel if they initiate or authorize publications (or blogs/opinion columns like ours) which damage their own reputations.

    According to the courts, consent is inferred when the person suing for libel encouraged or participated in the defamatory publication.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s