http://www.diaperswappers.com/forum/showthread.php?t=362364

Lee 03-11-2008 08:46 PM

Update to DS Rules

The DS Rules have been updated to further clarify our policies and the “3 strikes” system we have in place. Please read the updated rules and by continuing your activity on the forum, you are agreeing to the new rules. If you have any questions please PM one of the admin team. Thanks! :thumbsup:

Quote:

Originally Posted by NEW RULES
Important Rules at a GlanceDiaper Swappers utilizes a “3 Strikes” policy to help maintain s clean and positive atmosphere.

Violations that count as a strike:
1. Any hateful, rude, racist, derogatory, foul language (spelled correctly or not, this is a family friendly community), insulting, or otherwise mean content (pictures, blinkies, avatars)
2. The use of your signature, posts, or avatar to promote competing boards (other mama-targeted forums)
3. Using letters or symbols as a code not understood by the general public
4. Posting one-liners (abrasive sayings), pictures (picture of person with head up their rear end), or smilies (like banging head against the wall) in threads for the sole purpose of further fueling the fire in a hot topic
5. Posting a thread saying, “Hey, look at my siggy”
6. Quoting private messages on the forum. Private messages are private.
7. Linking to a FSOT post regarding a negative/neutral feedback left for you
8. Using a slogan, sign, etc that indicates membership in an elitist clique or group: no cliques please
9. Unsolicited purchasing opportunities
10. Posting the same thing more than two times in a thread
11. Bashing the site staff or DS as an entity (you can share you opinion in a respectful way, but “DS stinks” will NOT be acceptable)

Penalties at a Glance
1. 3 signature violations and you permanently lose your signature space, or if deemed appropriate, a permanent ban
2. 3 avatar violations and you permanently lose your avatar space, or if deemed appropriate, a permanent ban
3. 3 violations mentioning competing boards and you permanently lose your PM ability, or if deemed appropriate, a permanent ban
4. 3 spam violations and you are temp banned for 1 month, or if deemed appropriate, a permanent ban

Please note that mods and admins have the right to use their discretion and will do what they feel is best for the community as a whole. Certain rule violations will require an instant permanent ban (like posting p*rn). If you have an issue with an action the site staff has taken, please contact one of the members on the admin team through PM.

Well, I was sure DS mods and admin were “super busy” already… with all the crappy, porny, ads popping up and banners they’re giving us. Now, they’ve really turned into the police.

1.  They aren’t even following their OWN rules.  How many times have people had to report nasty ads and banners? Pop ups about flinging panties on brittany? Crotch shots, etc? I mean, it would be nice if THEY did the same for our sake.  The b*tch from a member is hardly as offensive as seeing someone’s tatas hanging out in an ad of theirs.

2. People start threads about what other boards they visit all the time.  What is DS scared of? They pull shit like this and people start looking for other forums… what do they expect? You can’t tell people they can’t talk about other boards/forums, yet have threads started about the topic all the time.

3. What…. ever….. KMA…

4. Wow, so if you reply, make sure it’s a ducks and bunnies, 2 liner post… and don’t forget the goodvibes smiley.

5. “Hey, look at my siggy?” Really?  I’d love to see that ban reason in someones siggy. That would be hilarious!

6. So, we can’t quote private messages, yet people can be banned for sending them? If private messages are private, I should be able to share my do not b/s/t list with whomever I please.  Since it’s private, you have no reason to bitch.

7. – 10. Is just more of the same crap.  I feel like I should pull out my black and white striped jumper.

So, where else is there that one can go to get a little adult interaction, without the over moderation and super policing?

Advertisements
Comments
  1. Kim says:

    Funny I was banned, people got PISSED and then there was a rule change. I NEED TO GET ON DS….THERE IS A MAMA THERE I AM IN A TRANSACTION WITH AND I NEED MY PMs THE ADMINS WILL NOT ANSWER MY EMAILS…

  2. Kristina-Prawn* says:

    For real? And Lee touts about how he is “protecting” his members from the big bad BGs. Yet, he feels no obligation to protect his virginal flock from soft porn and suggestive ads? Oh right, because he doesn’t MAKE any money off BGs, but he DOES make money off the ads.

    Got it. Check.

  3. Covertmama says:

    http://www.mama-drama.us/forums/index.php
    No moderation, no BS. Own your own shit. It’s refreshing.

  4. APuritanLady says:

    Oh good grief, they should at least make it possible for you to finish a transaction, Kim!

  5. theboardbitch says:

    FWIW, he denies it but Lee is targeting one specific board with most of these rules,
    you can’t post a link to another site, unless the other site is approved, so far as I have seen the only one NOT approved is TheBatgirls.
    Lee has banned several well known Batgirls in the last few hours.

    I think it is funny. Anyone else remember the big uproar when CMT and TNN banned the Garth Brooks video, and everyone had to rush out and buy it to see why it was banned? Totally started his career,

    Thanks for the free advertisement Lee!

  6. Heather says:

    In response to your last question, I know it may have been retorical, hehe, but MISFITMOMS.COM is a great place to go. Plus Kim is there, even better. 🙂

  7. Kim says:

    Apparently all forums may be mentioned except for Misfitmoms.com or batgirls.

    BS

  8. sbolen says:

    I’ve taken a break from DS for the past week. I’m glad I did. What a mess. What is wrong with these people?
    Also, why is the board run by two men?
    Kim, do you want me to contact the person for you and give them your real email addy?

  9. Kristina-Prawn* says:

    Perhaps because those sites might corrupt the minds of the submissive woman?. Encourage them to speak minds and develop ideas about the world? Whatev.

  10. J says:

    Oh I so wish that you had the Poof be gone thread somewhere I missed all of it.

  11. Kim says:

    Thank you yes, I need Deanner??? I THINK that is her name I need her addie.

    I really hope that is the sn of the mama I need…I can’t really remember….She bought 3 boxes of girl scout cookies from me……

  12. Kim says:

    Copied and pasted from a google search on Lee Dodds:

    I reviewed the website foru.ms a few months ago and gave it a pretty poor review. To be honest, it has surprised me over the past few months. The site has become more open and, although it is still overflowing with anti-Mormons, the owner has allowed LDS members to moderate a forum for discussion about LDS topics (called a “community”). A pretty Christian move, if you ask me. That may change in the near future.

    Lee Dodd, who first came to my attention for his recent participation in the controversial sale of ReligiousForums.com, has purchased foru.ms and made his opinion on Mormonism and Mormons in the community crystal clear. I’m including a few examples from his announcement thread.

    The question that everyone (or at least the Mormons and their antagonists) were wondering came up quickly. He was asked whether or not be believed that Mormonism is a cult. His response was clear, concise, and left no question. “Yes sir, I do.”

    This was then followed up with the question, “How do you plan to include our LDS (that’s Mormon for those who may not know) friends? Can they have a congregation area even if they are a cult?” Lee responded, “Excellent question and not sure exactly what my feelings are on that. Not sure if I want them to have their own forum, definitely something to consider and decide upon.” So, something that was debated heavily for weeks, will now be open for discussion again.

    Further discussion about “non-Christians” being moderators on the forums followed, with Lee saying that he wasn’t sure that was in his vision.

    I’m not going to say that Lee is a bigot. I don’t know him, and I don’t know that is the case. I was recently reading an article (I wish I could remember the source) that mentioned how open prejudice against Mormonism is one of the still accepted forms of discrimination in our country. This is a great example of that.

    Could you imagine the outrage if Lee had posted that he would have to think about allowing blacks who consider themselves Christian to participate freely in the forums? Honestly, I don’t see much of a difference and 150 years ago, that might have been an acceptable position for many Southern Christians. Things may not have changed much in some circles. It seems that the prejudice has shifted its focus.

    What I will say is that these comments show he is an inexperienced CEO and has a lot to learn. He is also horribly misinformed about Mormonism. He may surprise everyone, but so far, it looks like foru.ms is in for some more change and turmoil.

    I would invite Lee to send me his case for Mormonism being a cult and non-Christian at any time, and I will happily respond to it on this blog. If not, a public apology would be a nice way to start mending fences.

  13. MarineWife says:

    uhh\!
    I was told by a mod that they couldn’t see what ws in PMs but obviously they can if they are banning people for things they PM eachother

  14. Amanda says:

    The new rules are retarted. I am currentyl in violation of rule #7 because of a retalitory Fb issue that the ADMIN refuse to look at…Lee posted this today in response to my refusal to remove the link until they review the problem
    “We do our best to reduce scammers, ban them, and keep this place as safe as we possibly can. Ultimately the responsibility is on you. We make no claim to review all cases or make all things right, we can’t. We do our best though. You trade here at your own risk. Just like eBay or Amazon or….”

    Funny they make no claim to review all cases….then HOW are they doing their best to reduce scammers?

  15. Tara says:

    Notice rule number 1 about hate, rudeness, and racism? Should Lee then be punished for his own rule violations?

    Recent post freshly deleted:

    Lee Dodd Purchases Foru.ms

    I reviewed the website foru.ms a few months ago and gave it a pretty poor review. To be honest, it has surprised me over the past few months. The site has become more open and, although it is still overflowing with anti-Mormons, the owner has allowed LDS members to moderate a forum for discussion about LDS topics (called a “community”). A pretty Christian move, if you ask me. That may change in the near future.

    Lee Dodd, who first came to my attention for his recent participation in the controversial sale of ReligiousForums.com, has purchased foru.ms and made his opinion on Mormonism and Mormons in the community crystal clear. I’m including a few examples from his announcement thread.

    The question that everyone (or at least the Mormons and their antagonists) were wondering came up quickly. He was asked whether or not be believed that Mormonism is a cult. His response was clear, concise, and left no question. “Yes sir, I do.”

    This was then followed up with the question, “How do you plan to include our LDS (that’s Mormon for those who may not know) friends? Can they have a congregation area even if they are a cult?” Lee responded, “Excellent question and not sure exactly what my feelings are on that. Not sure if I want them to have their own forum, definitely something to consider and decide upon.” So, something that was debated heavily for weeks, will now be open for discussion again.

    Further discussion about “non-Christians” being moderators on the forums followed, with Lee saying that he wasn’t sure that was in his vision.

    I’m not going to say that Lee is a bigot. I don’t know him, and I don’t know that is the case. I was recently reading an article (I wish I could remember the source) that mentioned how open prejudice against Mormonism is one of the still accepted forms of discrimination in our country. This is a great example of that.

    Could you imagine the outrage if Lee had posted that he would have to think about allowing blacks who consider themselves Christian to participate freely in the forums? Honestly, I don’t see much of a difference and 150 years ago, that might have been an acceptable position for many Southern Christians. Things may not have changed much in some circles. It seems that the prejudice has shifted its focus.

    What I will say is that these comments show he is an inexperienced CEO and has a lot to learn. He is also horribly misinformed about Mormonism. He may surprise everyone, but so far, it looks like foru.ms is in for some more change and turmoil.

    I would invite Lee to send me his case for Mormonism being a cult and non-Christian at any time, and I will happily respond to it on this blog. If not, a public apology would be a nice way to start mending fences.

    Obviously I can not post the link but I am sure you guys can google to find it. Lots of love to you all!
    Thanks

  16. onlygirl says:

    i was banned and no reason given at all.

  17. The Bored Bitch says:

    Wow. Just wow.

    Makes me grateful for http://www.thebatgirls.com

  18. CC says:

    One of the most insane ridiculous posts I’ve ever seen on diaper swappers:

    Today, 02:08 PM
    Crystalann’s Avatar
    Crystalann
    Registered Users

    Join Date: Jul 2007
    Posts: 20
    Ratings: 5
    Feedback: 100%
    My Mood:

    I need help ladies, he is abusing me …..

    of my religous rights and freedom of speech

    Due to all the DRAMA that has been going on here, i wanted to throw in my 2c, Sadly i will be banned for what i am going to say, This is inevitable because well 2 reasons, 1> i am speaking the TRUTH and 2> i am about to openly admit i am Lds

    for those who do not know lds is Mormon, We are a VERY nice RELIGIOUS group That Joseph Smith said he had received a revelation, which would ultimately lead to the restoration of the true church and its priesthood, that had been lost. He believed this priesthood and authority had been lost for centuries, until he had his revelation during the 1820s… Well according to the OWNER of diaper swappers we are a cult, Now i ask you, WHAT cult could have survived since the 1820’s ??? what he Outright admits, and says about the lds community is straight bigotry and unacceptable, I also wanted to add that a few of my friends have been banned from this site, for no real reason. and At a time when the poor dear was in the middle of a miscarriage??

    and what gives a GUY the right to take on a board, and then not have the compassion, and understanding that us mothers, try and have?

    I mean come on, i wonder if lee, ever even saw a Real life cloth diaper in his life, Probable not, he is in it for the money…. hmm all you mods not getting paid, you wanna know how much he makes off his many boards? look it up, i bet it is more than you think!!

    The following is a quote from a fellow Mormon i would like to post, She says everything i feel, But because i have Children i do not have the time to sit and type it up,

    One of the most repeated accusations made by critics of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints is that we are a “cult.” When you hear this accusation, please ask precisely what is meant by the frightening term “cult.” The use of that word is not really meant to explain anything about the Church or its positions, but is meant to end discussion and investigation with scare tactics. “A cult? Oh no!”

    The primary definition for “cult” in many dictionaries is synonymous with “religious organization.” Yes, I suppose that definition fits. However, anti-Mormons would not sell many books and pamphlets if they had titles like, “Mormonism is a Religious Organization!” or “Lure of the Religious Organizations!” According to the dictionary, “cult” can also mean a group that pays special devotion to some individual. Yes, we are also guilty of that, and that individual is the Lord Jesus Christ. But recently, contrary to its original generic meaning, the word “cult” in popular use carries frightening overtones. It evokes images of suicidal, comet-chasing groups, physically abusive regimens, corrupt tyrants and Satanic rituals. Clearly there are some odd beliefs and groups in the world – but every religion can seem odd or even extreme to those who do not understand it. The problem is that any general definition of “cult” in the negative, frightening sense is likely to include many presumably “decent” religions, including early Christianity, which was also denounced as a “sect” and a “cult” by its critics. When other Christian label Latter-day Saints as a cult, they implicitly create their own special definitions, but nearly all of these special definitions would likewise condemn Christ and the early Christians as cultists, as I will show below. Many of the special definitions of cult that “cult warriors” use boil down to this: “A cult is any group whose members don’t believe exactly the same way I do.”
    My desire is that people will see through the clouds of misunderstanding that may obscure their view of the Latter-day Saint people, and perhaps seek to understand us better rather than rashly condemning us.
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    __________________
    Crystal Wife to Dan 7/08/05 Mom to Alex aka Little Bear 3/15/06 and ” Samantha Aka Our Little Mo Mo 8/10/07 And Baby 3# Due Sept 9th 2008 IM GONNA HAVE 3 UNDER 3!

  19. Kellie says:

    onlygirl Says: March 12, 2008 at 9:05 pm
    i was banned and no reason given at all.
    whatttt?????? OMG!

  20. Christine says:

    In response to post #10, here is the link to “Poof be gone!”

    http://www.diaperswappers.com/forum/showthread.php?t=362026

  21. sbolen says:

    Onlygirl you were banned?
    Are you kidding me? Why?

    Kim, what is your email addy to get to Deanner?

  22. sbolen says:

    Who all was banned last night? Can we start a list?
    Kim
    Onlygirl
    FerrFerr
    Green~Mammy
    ApplePieBaby
    Journey (Is she the one with the pretty picture of herself in her avi?)
    Scatterbrainedmom
    mama23boys

  23. ~Peach~ says:

    Wow craziness. I better watch my ass or Im next. Im joining batgirls now so be on the lookout of peachykeen!

  24. wow, all those bannings? What is the “reason” in their siggy? “We don’t like her, so we’ve made up arbitrary rules and banned her.”

  25. ~Peach~ says:

    I didnt see a reason in anyones siggy.

  26. becka says:

    omg! i hadn’t realized yet onlygirl and ferrferr were banned 😦
    this is just stoopid

    oh, and hippydippymama was also banned last night

  27. Kim says:

    I was banned Monday morning, not that night of random banning. It was my banning apparently that got the ball rolling. I was banned apparently for 2 reasons.

    1. having an extra line in my siggy from my mistake. When I took out my pregnancy smileys I must have hit center, it centered everything and made my siggy 5 lines, not 4.

    2. Because I started a post in diaper chatter about how I wanted to MAYBE start a HC store in a congo on HC…I needed a name. So that was considered spam. Even though that thread was there all day. It wasnt until the next day, when the Admin that OBVIOUSLY wanted me GONE called it spam. BS reason.

  28. Kellie says:

    I’m really surprised I haven’t even gotten a hand slap….I’ve been doing a LOT of on board complaining! LOL!

  29. sbolen says:

    I think they let hippydippymama back in.
    I just profile-stalked her and she’s not banned.

    Yeah, no reason given on any of them.

  30. The Bored Bitch says:

    Lee is systematically banning people from forums he doesnt like.

  31. Kim says:

    They need this smiley on DS and should make the code :LEE:
    [IMG]http://i7.photobucket.com/albums/y284/kim123321/SMILEBAN-1.gif[/IMG]

  32. Jena/lilyfish says:

    they banned, like almost all of the people i like? 😦 well, that really sucks.

    I am so disappointed. Lee is a real piece of work.

    I miss what DS was. Ah well. Guess I’ll give Misfit Moms a shot.

  33. Kristina-Prawn* says:

    Just so you know, I’ve been banned as well. No reason given. Banned for life.

    I was soggygranolamom on DS. Oh and I’m a BG. Must be why I was banned. I’ve been a member there for almost 3 years and have 100% feedback and over 2000 posts.

  34. ~Peach~ says:

    I just joined batgirls and so help me god if they ban me im doing a chargeback thru my paypal for my site supporter thing. Any of the ladies that got banned site supporters? Get em where it hurts: the wallet.
    I get why some of them were banned becus they just wouldnt let up and in all honesty wth is the purpose of harassing a mod via pm or a thread. Do you guys really think all the bitching and moaning is gonna change anything?

  35. The Bored Bitch says:

    What is the point of banning BGs for being BGs?

    We have members who said little to nothing who are being banned. It is not just the people who got in Lees face.

    I find it amusing that you refer to asking questions of mods and admin to be harassment.
    The discussion was semi-civil until Lee and his mods began to refer to people as childish and in need of an attitude adjustment.

    Once backed into a corner by his own words, Lee took the low road. He not only showed an amazing lack of professionalism but he showed an amazing lack of decency and respect to the women on that forum.

    The preferential treatment of leg humpers and Conservative Christians is appalling.
    It would be one thing if Lee openly admitted he is moving DS to being a conservative christain diapering site and a used diaper eBay.
    But he doesnt and wont because he is afraid to lose the biz. Instead, he passive aggressively bans people who disagree with him.

    We have seen how he feels about Mormons.
    Wonder what else will be dug up down the road.

    No, the bitching and moaning might not change anything but we will continue to give people the information to make their own choices about where they choose to invest their money.

    This blog and BGs and other forums that allow discussion about the way Lee runs DS is a great venue to inform and I applaud the blogger for allowing the information to be put out there.

    Its sad that it takes a blog like this to act as DS’s conscience.

  36. Kim says:

    Well. looks like my 3 month ban has been turned to a perm. ban. Not sure why though. I just tried to log in and it said my ban will be lifted: Never.

  37. Mommato5sf says:

    I was banned as well. When I used an anonymous browser **hint, hint, other ladies* I was able to see it was for Inflamatory and Harassing statements. I was momma6_2angels there. FTR, I’m a pretty conservative christian and also posted a thing about the crappy job he did with christianforums.com. So, he’s obviousy not keeping all us CC’s around to serve his purpose.

    His profile at Christian Forums claims he is a pastor of some church in Texas called Believers Community Church. Some Pastor huh???

  38. lysol says:

    ugh, this is all so depressing 😦
    why is it that Lee suddenly came out of the woodwork and is on a rampage to change the entire board? maybe he’s been thinking about it for a long time, and given the right circumstances, he finally got the opportunity to change the board into what he wants it to be. it’s making me sick.
    *PUKE*

  39. onlygirl says:

    someone pmed lee for me and i guess i was part of a planned attack on him. the only thing i can think of is i posted on the lds thread, but i wasnt doing it as part of a group. i posted becuase it was scary and thats what i said. no biggie. if anyone wants to get ahold of me you can at onlygirl_1@msn.com.

  40. lysol says:

    onlygirl, haha that’s BS! now Lee is just being paranoid. and probably why he has that new “clique” rule added to the long list of ridiculous/vague rules. OMG OH NOEZ THE CLIQUE IS PLANNING AN ATTACK ON ME, SHEWT GOTTA BANZ THEMZ ALL!!!!1!111!!
    this is all really stupid. now DS is just going to be a BLAH board with BLAH robot personalities and anyone with a different opinion is going to get a slap in the face. stupid stupid stupid.

  41. The Bored Bitch says:

    Lysol,

    I find myself wondering if he isnt getting ready to sell the board again.

    Perhaps he is just trying to clean it up so it sells better?

  42. ~Peach~ says:

    The reason I say harassment is cus thats how one of the mods took it. I was speaking to her on YIM when all this was going down. She was frustrated becus everyone just bombarded the admins and mods like it was their fault. The mods/admins do not make the rules. Lee does so if you have issue with the rules take it to the source. And Im sorry but wtf did the mamas who kept at it think was gonna happen? Its his forum of course he is gonna ban whoever the hell he feels like banning.

  43. onlygirl says:

    peach i didnt keep at anything, i only made a couple of posts. and just sat back and read what was going on. as new as i was, i dont belong to any clique or group. i didnt even question the rules. i was lumped with something i had no part of. now if it look to lee like i was in a mob fine, but it wasnt the facts. i am not all that upset about it anyhow, i have been kicked out of better places irl LOL i just recieved the last of my transactions so its all good to me.

  44. mamamia says:

    the whole new rules thing is just nuts! I can’t believe that these people are being banned for such stupid reasons…. I am still waiting on something I paid for in NOVEMBER from a person and she is still a registered member… interesting.

  45. mermaidmommy says:

    I asked in the poof be gone thread how much a board like DS would cost and he did say it wasn’t for sale…

    Not that he would tell the truth. He could be thinking of going public with it, though…

  46. DS Drama Mama 2 says:

    doesn’t he make over a million+ a year from his forums? I read a lot of links I thought one said that.

  47. ~Peach~ says:

    onlygirl, I feel for you as I really do like you. I do believe that alot of the ladies banned got lumped in it cus they posted something and someone figured just ban them all and sort it out later. However some of the ladies as it was pointed out to me bitch about not being treated like grown ups then they act like children themselves. And yes some of them did keep at it like ladida wtf is gonna happen. A former mod got banned for crying out loud so no one is exempt. Just mind your ps and qs and really what good is voicing your opinion on the internet? Is it really gonna do good? IMO no its just gonna get u banned or ppl are gonna avoid you like the plague.

  48. The Bored Bitch says:

    Peaches,

    I thought Lee did his mods a disservice by throwing them to the wolves without properly informing them of the new rules.

    They were out there floundering around, wondering what was going on while Lee made up the rules as he went along.

    Its a shame. They deserved better than that.

  49. Kellie says:

    actually, it has done a lot of good. I am impressed with Lee that at least he appears to be listening…

    Look, Kim is back!

  50. DS Drama Mama 2 says:

    “actually, it has done a lot of good. I am impressed with Lee that at least he appears to be listening…

    Look, Kim is back!”

    Just posted a blog on it mama 🙂

  51. theboardbitch says:

    Lee’s not listening, he was afraid of losing money.

  52. lysol says:

    IAW theboardbitch ^^^

  53. onlygirl says:

    ok peach, i got it, i was suprised many of them were not banned sooner as the crap went on. i just wanted you all to know that i didnt keep on anything. i made maybe 3 posts during the entire debaucle which for me is pretty restrained. i just wanted to point out my banning was lumped in with some others when i had no part of any planned attack. it was all just me. bieng banned for bieng me is cool, but for a planned attack??? nope didnt happen.

  54. LeesAWanker says:

    Kim’s back but Lee still doesn’t GAS. Since this latest drama has happened forums are getting an influx of new members from DS. He’s just trying to save his ass.

  55. LeesAWanker says:

    As far as how much he makes a year. About a year ago, there was a contest that he ran. Someone would win 1,000 dollars. It said that was 1/5 of Lee’s DAILY earnings. So he could be making 5,000+ a day!

  56. Tara says:

    Did anyone notice how Lee keeps praising Ooey for how she handled the situation? What because she narked on some posts and didn’t give an opinion on her friends being banned one by one? Way to reward that backstabbing behavior with praise. Even another member had to ask Ooey if she was Lee’s wife. Hmmm starting to wonder what’s really going on behind the scenes.

    Lee: Special thanks to you Ooey for really being reasonable through this whole ordeal…much love for you…

    Ooey: You haven’t done so bad yourself Lee!

    Asianmama: ?? is ooey lees wife? or am i just nutzo?????

    Ooey: You are super nutzo My DH is Asian

    MatildasMum: Get a ROOM, you two! Sheesh!!

    Ooey: 😉

    All this and more can be found here: http://www.diaperswappers.com/forum/showthread.php?t=364044

  57. The Bored Bitch says:

    Moral of the story is, to get in Lee’s good graces, nark on your friends.

    Let me jot that down in my little notebook here….

  58. Tara says:

    *cough* or his pants *cough*

  59. LeesAWanker says:

    Well that’s one way to get to the top! Anything for you, Webmaster!

  60. lysol says:

    meow Lee. rarrr.

    or not. bleh.

  61. onlygirl says:

    kim it really sucks ass that you can just act like no one was affected by all this shit. i dont mean i dont think you should go back to ds if you want, but dont rationalize away the fact that you were the direct result of many many people bieng banned. at least own it.

  62. ~Peach~ says:

    I just got my first strike on this new rules. At least it was a good one. I told all the gm cult members to get thefuck over the fact someone else is making a dipe similar :D. Oh and it felt good too!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s